Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
American Heritage MagazineApril/May 1986    Volume 37, Issue 3
Browse Archives

Browse our American Heritage Magazine issues from 1954 to the present.

Archives >>

 
 
 
 
 
TIME MACHINE
By Karolyn Ide

 
1861 One Hundred and Twenty-five Years Ago

On April 12 the shelling at Fort Sumter began and, with it, the Civil War. The fort had been very much in the public mind since President Lincoln’s inaugural address a month earlier. He had declared that he would “hold, occupy and possess the property and places belonging to the Government,” and everyone knew he was referring to that besieged island stronghold off Charleston, South Carolina. By refusing to abandon Federal forts located in Confederate states, Lincoln was telling the five-month-old Confederacy that he did not recognize it as a legitimate independent government. Furthermore, his wording implied that the North refused to take the first step toward war; if hostilities were to break out, the South would be the aggressor.

But out on the sandbar where Fort Sumter stood, Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of eighty men had taken stock of their dwindling food supplies and sent word to Washington that they couldn’t hold out much longer. If they weren’t soon resupplied, they would have to abandon the fort.

Lincoln’s plan to peacefully bide his time was crushed. Sending ships to resupply Fort Sumter would end in war, and he knew it but had no choice. On April 8 the Federal War Department formally notified South Carolina’s governor that ships would be sailing to Fort Sumter “with provisions only.” Four days later the shelling started.

With the sound of the first distant gun and the sight of the bomb’s red fuse cleaving the sky, the citizens of Charleston gathered on their rooftops and stood spellbound by the spectacle. “Hard knowledge of war’s reality would come later,” wrote the historian Bruce Catton, but “at the hour of its dawn, with a new day’s light coming in from the open sea, and a thin haze rising to soften the hard outlines of fort and city and mounded batteries, the war had an incredible and long-remembered beauty.” Thirty-four hours later, Major Anderson surrendered, and Fort Sumter fell into Confederate hands.

• April 15: President Lincoln calls for seventy-five thousand volunteers to sign up for a ninety-day tour of duty to suppress the “insurrection.”


 
1886 One Hundred Years Ago

On the evening of May 4, two to three thousand workers gathered in Chicago’s Haymarket Square to protest the killing of two strikers by police at the McCormick Reaper plant the day before. Despite their anger, they didn’t become violent but listened peacefully to three speakers who urged them to continue their fight for socialism and an eight-hour day. Pacing through the crowd was Chicago’s mayor, Carter Harrison, who decided the meeting was no cause for worry and went home to bed. So, too, when it began to rain, did all of the women and children and most of the men, until all that remained was a cluster of two to three hundred. The last speaker, Samuel Fielden, a former Methodist minister, was just concluding his remarks.

But a few blocks away at the Desplaines Street police station, two detectives rushed in to report to Inspector John “Black Jack” Bonfield that Fielden was using “inflammatory language.” Bonfield was not a man given to lengthy deliberation, nor could he have been described as sympathetic to the labor movement. That very evening, according to one witness, he had confided that “the greatest trouble the police had in dealing with the Socialists was that they had their women and children with them at the meetings so that the police could not get at them. [Bonfield] said he wished he could get a crowd of about three thousand of them together, without their women and children, and he would make work of them.” Upon hearing his detectives’ report, the inspector seemed to have thought his opportunity had arrived. In the next moment he was racing his squad of policemen down to the square at a run. Arriving at the wagon on which Fielden stood, he shouted, “I command you, in the name of the people of the state of Illinois, immediately and peaceably to disperse!” Fielden protested that they were peaceable, but then relented and agreed to leave.

That was the moment someone—it was never learned who—chose to throw a bomb. It landed among the policemen, and the ensuing explosion rocked the street. After a stunned silence, the policemen grabbed their guns and fired recklessly into the crowd—and into each other. According to the Chicago Tribune, a police official acknowledged that “a very large number of police were wounded by each other’s revolvers.” There was no evidence that the workers ever fired back. When the Haymarket Riot ended, seven policemen were fatally wounded. No count was taken of civilian casualties, but according to the Chicago Herald, some fifty lay dead or wounded in the streets.

That was just the beginning of the Haymarket affair. Within the next few weeks, the police indiscriminately arrested anyone known as a radical. Thirty-one people were indicted, and eight were brought to trial. None of the eight were found guilty of throwing the bomb, but they were convicted by a hysterical public, an allegedly packed jury, and a clearly biased judge on circumstantial evidence of being “accessories before the fact” and “accessories to each other” in the murder of the single policeman who was indisputably killed by the bomb.

All three speakers at the meeting were convicted, and on November 11, 1887, four men, including two of the speakers, were hanged. One of the eight committed suicide in his cell, and the remaining three, including Fielden, were pardoned in 1893 by Gov. John Peter Altgeld, who held that Bonfield’s unnecessary action made him “responsible for the death of the police officers.” Altgeld himself was the final casualty of the Haymarket affair: his beliefs cost him his next election.

Emily Dickinson died on May 15 of a kidney ailment. She was fifty-five years old, and her reputation didn’t extend much farther than the town line of Amherst, Massachusetts, where she was known as an eccentric, spinster recluse who wore only white. For the preceding sixteen years she had confined herself to the home and garden she shared with her younger sister Lavinia and had avoided contact with all but her closest friends. She had sent samples of her verse to a few well-known men of letters, but they had uniformly discouraged her, saying that what she produced didn’t merit the term poetry. Dickinson had accepted their judgments and her obscurity. Upon her death, only a handful of her poems had been published.

After Dickinson’s funeral, her sister Lavinia began sorting through her belongings. In accordance with Dickinson’s instructions and contemporary tradition, Lavinia consigned her sister’s correspondence to the flames. Then, one day, while digging through a bureau, Lavinia discovered a box she’d never seen before. Within it she found sixty small booklets of her sister’s poems, made by folding sheaves of writing paper in half and sewing them together up the spine. Lavinia was astonished. She knew her sister wrote poetry, but she had no inkling she had written so much or preserved it so carefully. Over time, other booklets turned up in various hiding places, and envelopes, too, stuffed with poems scrawled on slips of paper.

Lavinia became determined to see her sister’s poetry published. She pestered the writer Mabel Loomis Todd until Todd accepted the task of literary executor. Fifty-nine years after Emily Dickinson’s death, nearly all of her poems had been published. Today Amherst’s recluse ranks among America’s greatest poets.

• April 22: In the first presidential address on labor, President Grover Cleveland proposes that a national labor commission be created to arbitrate strikes.

• May 4: The first truly practical phonograph, called the Graphophone, is patented by Chichester Bell and Charles Sumner Tainter.


 
1961 Twenty-Five Years Ago

A new art form received some respectful attention in the May issue of ARTnews magazine when the New York artist Allan Kaprow explained: “Happenings are events which, put simply, happen. Though the best of them have a decided impact—that is, one feels, ‘here is something important’—they appear to go nowhere and do not make any particular literary point.”

Born in the the counterculture movement of the late fifties and sixties, happenings were staged in small theaters, lofts and garages, in parking lots or on beaches. They were improvisational performances in which players were given only skeletal directions. Dialogue was dispensed with; viewers had to interpret what they could from action, music, and lighting. Players were wrapped in paper, hidden within boxes, or else pranced naked among the spectators, drawing them into the action.

Kaprow illustrates: “Everybody is crowded into a downtown loft, milling about, like at an opening. It’s hot. There are lots of big cartons sitting all over the place. One by one they start to move, sliding drunkenly and careening in every direction, lunging into people and one another, accompanied by loud breathing sounds over four loudspeakers. … A wall of trees tied with colored rags advances on the crowd, scattering everybody, forcing them to leave. … A nude girl runs after the racing pool of a searchlight, throwing spinach greens into it. … You giggle because you’re afraid, suffer claustrophobia, talk to someone nonchalantly, but all the time you’re there, getting into the act. …” For Kaprow, “getting into the act” meant that one would “cast aside for a moment … proper manners and partake wholly in the real nature of art and (one hopes) life.”

Happenings increased in variety and impropriety throughout the decade, and now are part of its curiously distant legacy, at rest in the great lumber room of time along with psychedelic posters, wide-wale corduroy bell-bottoms, and the Doors.


 
 
Discuss this article  |  Print this article  |  Email this article
 
 
E-Mail Newsletters
 
 

Get E-Mail Newsletters when we publish articles on any of the topics below:

FORT SUMTER, SC
 
STEPHEN GROVER CLEVELAND
 

Help

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.