Search 
     
 
 Most Popular Searches:  Thomas Paine | Thomas Jefferson | Music | Great Depression | Edison  
 
American Heritage MagazineOctober 1997    Volume 48, Issue 6
Browse Archives

Browse our American Heritage Magazine issues from 1954 to the present.

Archives >>

 
 
 
 
 
THE TIME MACHINE
BY FREDERIC D. SCHWARZ

 
1772Two Hundred and Twenty-five Years Ago
Tea and Antipathy

In the summer and fall of 1772, panic took hold of London’s financial circles. It began with the collapse of a firm called Neale, James, Fordyce, & Down. Alexander Fordyce had been speculating successfully for a decade, but in the early 1770s his investments went sour. He managed to deceive his partners for a while; according to one biographer, “It is said he succeeded in quieting their fears by the simple expedient of showing them a pile of bank notes which he had borrowed for the purpose for a few hours.” When things got too hot, though, Fordyce skipped town owing a hundred thousand pounds. In early June his firm suspended payment of its debts.

In a generally overextended market many other firms were just as vulnerable, and the dominoes started falling. By the end of June twenty major houses had collapsed. Those that were left suffered the usual squeeze: Debtors were slow to pay, while creditors were quick to demand payment. Among the hardest hit was the already foundering East India Company, which had a monopoly on trade, chiefly in tea, with Britain’s Asian colonies.

In September the company took out a loan from the Bank of England, to be repaid from the sale of goods later that month. But with buyers scarce, most of the sale had to be postponed, and when the loan fell due, the company’s coffers were empty. On October 29 the bank refused to renew the loan. That decision set in motion a chain of events that made the American Revolution inevitable.

The East India Company had eighteen million pounds of tea sitting in British warehouses. Selling it in a hurry would do wonders for its finances. The American market beckoned, but there were two problems. First of all, the company was required by law to sell its tea to the highest bidder in England, letting merchants there and in America ship and resell it. Second, tea sold in America carried a tax of threepence a pound, which made it unpopular with restive colonists.

After prolonged wrangling, in May 1773 Parliament let the company eliminate the middleman and market the tea itself through its own American agents. It also refunded duties that the company had paid upon bringing the tea to England. With these changes the East India Company could easily undercut the smugglers who had been taking much of its business. On the tax issue, however, the government would not budge. While admitting that threepence a pound yielded negligible revenue, it insisted on maintaining Britain’s power to tax its colonies.

It seemed a perfect compromise: The company would make money, the colonies would get cheap tea, and Britain would uphold its rights. So His Majesty’s government was quite surprised when citizens in Charleston, Philadelphia, New York, and most famously Boston vigorously rejected the tainted tea. Their “tea parties” showed that America would not be bribed into accepting taxation without representation. Yet that was not the only issue.

There was nothing new about the tea tax. Colonists had been paying it— and similar taxes on sugar, molasses, and wine—for years. The new and obnoxious feature of the Tea Act was the East India Company’s monopoly, which would deprive American merchants of their business in both legal and smuggled tea (and which they feared would be extended to many other goods). By alienating this wealthy and powerful group, the British united self-interest and revolutionary fervor in a combination that would soon destroy the colonial bond. Just as the failure of a single bank had caused a financial panic, so too did a seemingly innocuous attempt to collect a tax that was already on the books lead directly to the American Revolution.


 
1922 Seventy-five Years Ago
Topless Body in Humorless Town

On October 1 Isadora Duncan, the world-renowned pioneer of modern dance, arrived in New York City to begin her latest American tour. The trip started poorly when Duncan and her new husband, the Russian poet Sergei Esenin, were detained on suspicion of being Bolshevik agents. According to possibly embroidered recollections, Esenin had to promise not to sing the “Internationale,” and the promoter Sol Hurok was stripped naked in search of subversive literature before officials let them go.

Duncan began the tour with four well-received appearances at Carnegie Hall. As an orchestra played Tchaikovsky’s Marche Slav, she depicted the hardships of serfdom and the joys of liberation. In speeches afterward she appealed for goodwill toward the Soviet Union, to loud applause.

Boston, her next stop, was less receptive to Duncan’s mix of art and politics than Communist-friendly New York. Her costume was too brief and diaphanous for the staid Bostonians, and when she finished dancing—whether provoked by the audience’s tepid applause, too much Prohibition liquor, or her ever-uninhibited nature—Duncan felt moved to enlighten Boston on its lack of culture.

She mocked the plaster sculptures of Greek gods that ringed Symphony Hall: “They are false and you are as false as these statues.” She decried the “hidebound conventions that are the warp and woof of New England puritanism” and said, “Life is not real here.” Then she capped the speech by exposing one of her breasts and crying, “This—this is beauty!” The newspapers raised a furor, and Mayor James Curley reacted in traditional Boston fashion, banning future performances by Duncan to protect “the decent element of the community.”

In Indianapolis Duncan encountered another hostile mayor, Lew Shank, who came across uncannily like a Sinclair Lewis caricature: “Isadora ain’t fooling me any. She talks about art. Huh! I’ve seen a lot of these twisters and I know as much about art as any man in America, but I never went to see these dances for art’s sake. No, sir, I’ll bet 90 per cent of the men, or even 95 per cent, who go to see these socalled classical dances just say they think it’s artistic to fool their wives. … If she goes pulling off her clothes and throwing them in the air … there’s going to be somebody getting a ride in the wagon.”

Cleveland was cosmopolitan by comparison, treating Duncan to nothing worse than indifference. The poet Hart Crane, then an advertising copy-writer, wrote a friend that Duncan’s performance had been “glorious beyond words … a wave of life, a flaming gale that passed over the heads of the nine thousand in the audience without evoking response other than silence and some maddening cat-calls. … Glorious to see her there with her right breast and nipple quite exposed,” wrote the homosexual Crane.

In early February the San Francisco- born Duncan left “stupid, penurious, ignorant America” for the last time. Before her departure she criticized such American customs as monogamy (“What a preposterous thing that a woman should give children to the world by only one father!”), Prohibition (“Some of the liquor I drank here would kill an elephant”), and insufficient appreciation of Isadora Duncan (“I have been in sad financial straits in America. That is one grudge I feel towards my country”). Finally, she said, Americans “know nothing of Food, of Love, of Art.” With that she set off for the land of black bread and borscht, where her alcoholic, abusive husband would abandon her for a granddaughter of Leo Tolstoy. Duncan’s commitment to Art, however, remained undiminished until her accidental death in 1927.


 
1947 Fifty Years Ago
Levittown

On October 1 the first three hundred families, all headed by exservicemen, moved into brand-new Cape Cod houses in an instant suburb a dozen miles east of New York City. Four months earlier the area had been farmland, but since then Levitt & Sons had built two thousand houses. Levittown would soon become famous for turning families of modest means into homeowners, but at the start there was no Levittown and no homeowners. The development was called Island Trees (it would be renamed in 1948), and its acres of nearly identical two-bedroom houses were rental units—spacious by comparison with city apartments, but not meant for long-term occupancy. As the renters moved into their new homes on Peachtree, Appletree, and Cherry Tree Streets, they were descended upon by milkmen, grocers, and diaper services. With another 100 to 150 families moving in every week, there would be plenty of customers to go around.

Levitt switched from rentals to sales almost immediately. Renting cost sixty dollars a month, but with a loan obtained under the GI Bill, a veteran could buy one of the sixty-nine-hundred-dollar (at first) houses for only fifty-two dollars a month, with a minimal down payment. This shift toward ownership led the company to make its houses more attractive and distinctive. The Cape Cods had been offered in five “variations” that could have qualified for one of those spot-the-difference puzzles in the Sunday paper. In 1949 Levitt began selling “ranch” houses that were slightly larger and could be jiggered into more variable configurations. The ranches also came with such frills as a picture window in back (which usually afforded a panoramic view of the neighbors’ picture window) and a carport, fireplace, finished attic, and built-in television.

As the street names suggest, each six-thousand-square-foot lot came with four fruit trees, which residents were obligated to maintain. Other rules banned Levittowners from erecting fences, planting shrubs, hanging laundry outdoors on weekends, or selling their houses to blacks. (This last restriction was in accordance with federal housing policy, which decreed that a homogeneous community is a happy community. It also soothed anxiety about something postwar Long Islanders feared even more than nuclear annihilation: decreased property values.) By the time the last unit was finished, in 1951, Levittown contained 17,447 houses. In future years it would attract almost as many sociologists, as Levittown became an irresistible laboratory for scholars studying life in America’s suburbs.

H.S.T. on TV

On October 5 Harry S. Truman became the first President to address the nation on television from the White House. The subject of his’speech was the need for Americans to conserve food in order to feed Europe. Displaying little of his successors’ media savvy, Truma^i declined the opportunity to hog the camera. Instead he appeared as the last of five speakers, coming on after rousing talks from the Secretaries of Agriculture, State, and Commerce and the chairman of the Citizens Food Committee. With only a few hundred thousand television sets in the entire country, the vast majority of Americans listened to the program on radio.

Unlike Lyndon Johnson, who would often watch three evening newscasts at once, Truman never showed much interest in television. Still, he later made effective use of the medium to announce the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950 and his seizure of the nation’s steel industry during a 1951 strike. (One Truman innovation that did not, thankfully, become popular was CBS’s live broadcast of a 1950 cabinet meeting.)

In 1951 Truman made another accommodation to new technology that would have far-reaching results. He let reporters use recording machines to tape his remarks at press conferences, not for broadcast but so they could check their notes. For decades presidential press conferences had been informal, chatty affairs, and Truman’s decision did not immediately change this. But in 1955 his successor, Dwight D. Eisenhower, allowed his conferences to be filmed for broadcast, with the understanding that his press secretary could edit them first. From there it was a short step to live broadcasts, sound bites, one-liners, and all the fulsome vapidity that characterizes American politics in the information age.

Birth of the Sonic Boom

On October 14 Air Force Capt. Charles E. (“Chuck”) Yeager, flying a Bell X-I, became the first pilot to break the sound barrier. Today, with supersonic flight routine, the sound barrier seems an arbitrary figure, like a .300 batting average. But during and immediately after World War II it was real—and frightening. As planes of that era approached the speed of sound, cockpit controls would lock up and massive, uncontrollable turbulence would batter the airframe.

The X-I was designed for breaking the sound barrier and nothing else. It was tiny (Yeager had been chosen in part for his small stature), and its fuselage was shaped like a .50-caliber bullet, because bullets were known to achieve supersonic speeds. Its wings were swept back in a V shape to move the center of gravity toward the rear. Since jets were still in their early stages, the X-I had a rocket engine that ran on diluted ethyl alcohol and liquid oxygen. It provided two and a half minutes of extremely powerful thrust.

To break the barrier, the X-I was loaded into the bomb bay of a B-29 and released at twenty-five thousand feet with Yeager in the cockpit. He climbed to forty-two thousand feet on two of the engine’s four chambers, then switched on a third and watched his speed indicator zoom to seven hundred miles per hour, 1.06 times the speed of sound at that altitude. Observers on the ground heard a sonic boom, a sound that would become familiar in years to come. Yeager shot upward until his fuel was exhausted and then glided to a landing at Muroc Army Air Field in California. The Air Force did not officially announce the achievement until June 1948, though Aviation Week magazine had leaked word the previous December.

Not long afterward, a pair of planes even more distinctive, though much less important, than the X-I were launched. On October 21 the jet-powered Northrop YB-49 Flying Wing took to the air for the first time, landing at Muroc thirty-four minutes after leaving its factory in Hawthorne, California. As its nickname suggests, the YB-49 had no tail or fuselage, greatly reducing its weight. In theory, the resulting increase in range would make it valuable as a long-range bomber. In practice, packing everything inside the 172-foot wing—pilot, fuel tanks, and cargo space—made the airfoil too thick to take advantage of modern aeronautical science, and its unconventional shape made it hellishly difficult to control. In a June 1948 crash the pilot Glen W. Edwards (for whom Muroc was renamed in 1950) and four other crewmen died. Northrop eventually built eleven Flying Wings for the Air Force, but in 1949 the contract was canceled and the planes were chopped to pieces. Northrop revived the single-wing idea in the 1980s with its radar-invisible stealth bomber, this time with a computer to control its extremely unstable flight.

Then, on November 2, Howard Hughes flew his mammoth HK-I wooden flying boat—popularly called the Spruce Goose, though it was made mostly of plastic-impregnated birch— for the first and only time. Hughes had built the 150-ton plane during the war as a troop transport, using seven million dollars of his own money and eighteen million from the government. It was designed to seat 500 civilians or 700 soldiers. After flying seventy feet above California’s Long Beach Harbor for about a mile, Hughes denied that his flight had anything to do with a congressional committee that was investigating the boondoggle. Still, the plane never flew again. None of the armed forces could find any use for it, and it was eventually turned into a museum near Long Beach.


 
 
Discuss this article  |  Print this article  |  Email this article
 
Related Articles
 
 

THE TIME MACHINE
AH February/March 1998

 
 
 
 
E-Mail Newsletters
 
 

Get E-Mail Newsletters when we publish articles on any of the topics below:

ADVERTISEMENTS AND ADVERTISING
 
ALEXANDER FORDYCE
 
AMERICAN REVOLUTION
 
CHARLES E. YEAGER
 
DWIGHT DAVID EISENHOWER
 
EAST INDIA COMPANY
 
HARRY S. TRUMAN
 
HART CRANE
 
LEW SHANK
 
NORTHROP
 

Help

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Contact Us  |  Subscriber Services  |  Terms and Conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Advertising  |  Forbes.com  
 

American History from AmericanHeritage.com. Copyright 2008 American Heritage Publishing. All rights reserved.